I decided ill trade my A4 for MnM.
Main reason is midi and outputs.
A4 is a lovely sounding and has a powerfull sequencer.
I just wanna know what are the advantages of MnM over A4. Lets pretend they both sound the same so we dont fight over this. I want to know the FEATURES i get and which i lose.
Thanks!
MNM is virtually a modular in an Elektron box. Itâs way more flexible than the A4! Donât get me wrong, the A4 is wicked but very different from the MNM.
The MNM has loads of tricks up itâs sleeve, each track holds a machine of your choice & each differ greatly, FM, SID, VO, DIGIPRO waveforms, BEATBOX etcâŠAlso each Track can be an FX engine & Tracks can be routed thru each other.
Trigless trigs, Pitchless trigs, Poly, Multi Env, Multi Trig, the list goes onâŠ
My personal favorite are the Trig Tracks
Quote
TRIG TRACKS
For each track you have access to three individual sub tracks named trig tracks, offering individual control over the amplitude envelope, the filter envelope and the LFO trigs. This means you can separate pitch changes from envelopes and LFO trigging, allowing for very in-depth track sequencing.
Did I mention 3 LFOâs per Track! Itâs a winner in my book 
Donât expect instant gratification like the A4 tho, it takes some digging to get the best.
Tarekith did a tips & tricks here
http://tarekith.com/assets/monomachine_tipsandtricks.htm
Enjoy 
1 Like
plusn
3
Loose:
- No CV sequencing
- No Din Sync (e.g. for older Roland gear)
- No microtiming on the sequencer
- No individual track lengths on a pattern
- No supervoid reverb
Gain:
- Six individual midi tracks with each 3 free CC assignable LFOs = 18 LFOsâŠ
- Six individual outputs
- Six different digital synthesis engine machines: Superwave, Digipro, FM, VO, SID
- Digipro machine can load user customized waveforms (based on single cycle samples)
- much bigger display!
I have both Mnm and A4 plus MD mk2 (non UW).
I dont want to miss the good stuff.
âŠwell said, esp. these three points.
i donât know the a4, use my mnm for midi or mess with the other outputs, so i dunno how useful what i say will be
but in case it helps:
stacking tracks together has netted me many of my favorite results. iâve gotten great sounds out of single tracks as well, but stacking has often been the key to overcoming the âthin soundâ new users have frequently found frustrating. a useful part of stacking is the bus system, which allows you to get way more creative with the effects machines. itâs not as vast as a dawâs bus system of course but (like many things elektron) itâs often enough to get you there with some creative thinking.
personally i found an enlightening introduction to stacking in the soundpack that elektron hq released in june 2013. lots of the patterns and kits are set up in ways that take advantage of the possibilities.
worth mentioning: the mnm matured during the elektron-users forum era. its search engine still works, so once youâve absorbed the manual & tarekithâs doc, iâd head over there, raid the files section and read through old threads, itâs a gold mine.
Mihajlo,
I am a MnM soloist - check this out:
http://music.rvalkov.eu/
I am the happiest man in the world with the MnM - it is horribly underestimated now (I donât know why). It requires hard work to get the most out of it according to your personal tastes. This is my experience - I am not gonna get any other piece of gear soon. Hope my stuff would inspire you a bit about your purchase.
1 Like
jonah
6
you can assign note tracking to anything. you might want to turn it off for the filters tho.
guga
7
[quote=ââRady Valkovââ]
Mihajlo,
I am a MnM soloist - check this out:
http://music.rvalkov.eu/
I am the happiest man in the world with the MnM - it is horribly underestimated now (I donât know why). It requires hard work to get the most out of it according to your personal tastes. This is my experience - I am not gonna get any other piece of gear soon. Hope my stuff would inspire you a bit about your purchase.
[/quote]
i may have few reasons why the MnM is not as popular as it should be
- old machine
- steep learning curve: too much time needed to get a hit track in ten minutes
- people canât be bothered having to learn so many things when you can do everything with just one click âŠ

i say: bring back the sfx6!!!

edit: mmmmâŠsuppose youâve an empty AK enclosure and you stuff it with the MM hardware ⊠
Regarding sequencing workflow⊠is it similiar like an A4??
And how much will my knowledge of A4 help me with understanding MnM??
What are the similarities??
guga
9
if you already have an A4 then it wonât be a problem 
all Elektronâs machines have the same workflow, with differences which are more related to the machine itself rather than the workflow
Rady,
Iâve been really impressed with your demos â really great work! Keep it up, weâre listening and enjoying!
@Mihalo - yes, I think the MnM is a deeper instrument than the A4. If I had to choose one, the A4 would go and the MnM would stay, from the perspective of âwhat can I do with one box aloneâ.
Oh thank god. Words of comfort. 
Yeah rady, tracks are awesome⊠too âagressive/glitchyâ for my taste, but it really shows what MM can do.
If machines are what ill have to âstudyâ as a new concept, then it will be ok. Sequencer is my biggest issue. I dont wanna loose that âflowâ i had with A4.
Also, really liking melodic demos of MM i see on youtube.
If any of you guys makes more Berlin School style music with it⊠id like to hear that.
What do you think about outputs?? any noises? clean sound?? i guess if there was any, it changed after MK2 was released, like with MD i also had.
Accent
12
If youâre into Berlin School stuff, the arps will be your best friend, especially the SID setting with some chords. The âsequencer within a sequencerâ is also really useful for getting notes to fit where youâd like without microtiming.
1 Like
All of the technical difference have been listed already, and can be found on the Elektron website.
The real difference is that the MNM can produce sounds that sound extremely alien. It can also do a pretty good imitation of analogue synths, but itâs real uniqueness lies in its ability to make sounds that DON"T sound like classic vintage gear!
A4 is a great synth, but itâs always going to sound like an analogue synth (warm and slippery). The MNM will dazzle you with sonic surprises, especially once youâve gotten grips on what it can do (more or less). Iâve had my MNM for a little more than a year and use it a lot, and I still learn new stuff that makes me go âI didnât know it could do that!â Never ending joy.
The MNM has the User Waveform capability, which means you can load single cycle waveforms (there are thousands available for free download), and that means your MNM can have the tonal quality of the object the wave form was sampled from (i.e. Piano, guitar, horn, other synths, etc). So the MNM really has a slew of synth engines in it, but can also sort of clone other instruments. Plus, you can do psuedo wavetable sweeps using the User Waveform machines (LFO assigned to sweep through the waveform selection parameter = wicked) It really is a strange yet powerful feature of the MNM.
I think a lot of new MNM users get frustrated in the beginning due to the work flow (which you already have a grip on with the A4 âŠsame same), and because the machines and sounds of the MNM are so unlike everything else youâve played with before. It takes some serious dirty work to coax the magic out of the MNM, but for those who like to get their hands dirty, there is lots of magic to be found.
A few of my must know tips:
- turn Filter Key Follow OFF (makes the MNM sound MUCH fatter). Weird that the default is ON. Ask how, once youâve gotten your machine.
- layering sounds and using the routing to combine sounds/effects creates the magic.
- Many of the parameters in various machines within the MNM change more dramatically with slight tweaks than they do with big sweeping tweaks. One degree of a knob turn can change everything. More than is typical on analogue synths, and especially true with the FM machines in the MNM. Tweak slowly and carefully to find hidden sonic gold.
[quote=ââRady Valkovââ]
Mihajlo,
I am a MnM soloist - check this out:
http://music.rvalkov.eu/
I am the happiest man in the world with the MnM - it is horribly underestimated now (I donât know why). It requires hard work to get the most out of it according to your personal tastes. This is my experience - I am not gonna get any other piece of gear soon. Hope my stuff would inspire you a bit about your purchase.
[/quote]
Good stuff man!
Ozone
15
no presets a la A4, but as a woraround, its smart to have some kits dedicated to things like basses, leads, pads, percs so you have personalised starting points for building new patterns.
Also as a modular sequencable fx unit alone, its a justified buy.
1 Like
As soob as i got A4 i made empty reset, so presets are no problem. Looking forward to SID and FM especially. I got my moogs to accompany and add warmth.
Seems ill have to focus on sound design the most.
Thanks for the help guys!!!
Thatâs it - MnM is a time-eating monster!
But youâll never get disappointed!
1 Like
Orwell
18
and please go ahead and listen to the knife on flac or vinyl, the knife really showcase the monomachine
also a little bit of AE helps or maybe actress
sound ding wise :
always helps to run the mono Into analog effects
I really like the stock mono sound these days and/or going into the a4 with a touch of a4 chorus and reverb
btw, I really really like the monomachine compressor
1 Like
guga
19
hereâs something i did a while ago . itâs all MM based (SFX-6
) with no post processing/external effects. hope you find something interesting
zfigz
20
Iâve been meaning to reply to this for a while now.
I got my mnm back in 2007. It was my first real piece of hardware (I had also acquired a monome earlier that year). It really changed things for me since I was so used to mousing about when making music. While it limited my options, it also offered me a completely new palette to work with which made me much more aware of the sounds I was making. Itâs been the staple of my music ever since.
Coming from the A4, youâll have no problem wrapping your head around working with the mnm. As everyone has said, itâs not easy to get the sounds you want right off the bat, but with persistence, youâll get what you want. Iâd cleaning out all the stock patterns/kits though. Thatâs what I did when I first got mine and itâs really helped me learn in the ins/outs of the mnm.
I highly recommended figuring out a layout for your kits so that you donât have to think too much when tweaking. Also, be sure to utilize the following to get new/interesting sounds:
- Use your LFOs!
- Experiment with the different types of trigs.
- Play around with swing to give your instruments a more human feel.
- Iâd stay away from using the effects/routing options until youâve a firm grasp on creating kits etc.
- MIDI up some hardware and/or some VSTs to learn the midi sequencer.
- And finally, RTFMâŠ
In any case, just experiment and have fun!