No it can’t do that. For me it hasn’t been an issue. All my gear seems to land in the same spot on the grid with the Nome. The t1000 did not which was a mild pain but I just compensated in the daw.
2 Likes
Main appeal of erm is it has 4 outs you can adjust. If the nome had that it would be the best option out there imo. For me it’s not really a need though.
2 Likes
Simon (Nome creator) has been investigating possibilities for clock offset for past few months. Now with the release of TR-1000 and it’s offset issues it’s becoming more urgent to finally come up with something.
In the meantime, here is a workaround (DIY multi-clock) made with Nome + Blokas
He also may be working on a clock multiplier function which would be awesome. Most clock multipliers I have tried have latency and lag because they need a little time to multiply the tempo. But with the way Usync works, using its small buffer, I suspect this could be immediate. That would be huge, especially if they also add offset. Then you would have 2 DIN outs and an analogue out as well, which would make the nome a go to option for a lot of people looking for an affordable and rock solid clock sync option.
1 Like
it’s really funny but for 300 eur you can probably get a used torso t1, that can do exactly that +200 more things 
1 Like
Thats a divider only unless I am missing something. The multiplier is bit trickier.
1 Like
You are right, I wasn't aware of the engineering challenge that comes with multiplying tempo before. I see it now, thanks.
Clock divider
→ You wait for incoming clock events and occasionally output one
→ Output events are a subset of input events
Clock multiplier
→ You must create new timing events that did not exist in the input
→ Output events are an interpolated or extrapolated version of input timing
1 Like
It is sad that the DAW plugin support seems to leave behind Linux as an OS target… (at least when I last checked the other day, only “PC/Mac” were in the plugin download list).
Are you referring to Multiclock? That‘s a non issue, because any square wave click track will do. That was one of the reasons for me to get one over alternatives: it will work the same way without a VST, the VST is just a tiny bit more convenient.
Ooh, I see, thanks for the info. I thought the VST was more … elaborate?
That brings the Multiclock back on my shopping list (not on a particularly high spot, but still).
You can use the Nome2 without a plugin as well. It will take audio clock pulses. This is what people had to do on windows before the plugin supported the os.
2 Likes