I can relate to this. I go back and forth on whether I need a sampler or not. sometimes I won’t use one for months on end, and other times they’re essential. compare this to, say, a Roland TR machine and it’s night and day; the TR box has very few sound control parameters (some sounds, it’s just volume), the settings for everything are right in front of you, the sequencing options are bare minimum but still plenty, and the sounds are incredible right out of the box. a sampler needs work. you have to dig into it. you have to find a good source and the proper technique to massage it into what you want. or even sometimes… a shit source, which you know how to get what you want from. two totally different workflows. some find the former more conducive to the sounds and writing approach they’re after. others find the latter better sounding and more rewarding.
personally I don’t find the DT very menu-divey. other than going through a library of samples, of course. “this sounds good, I’ll try it…” ten minutes later of futzing around… “yeah this won’t work, lemme clear it and search through three levels deep of folders again to find another sound…” yeah, that can get annoying. but I guess so is plugging cables and turning knobs on a modular for 20 minutes, only to not find what you’re after and have to unplug it all to start over…
again, it’s a workflow thing… what works for one person or frame of mind on one day may not work for another person or frame of mind on another day. so if you’re lucky enough to be able to afford both options, go for it. if not, go for the one that suits you best.