Help! Do I really want that Rytm?

I treat my DAW as an instrument, maybe it depends on the approach to music. My music depends heavy on resampling and slicing itself, so that might be a reason.

well …

tl:dr - not much garbage to remove.

2 Likes

Oh yes, it surely did in the past. I had it for about a year and got stuck in trying to make it sound as analog-ish as possible. But FM … would be nice to have when leaning towards that explorative side of myself.

1 Like

Perfect to make a 2 tier stand in the middle for the syntakt and that orher thing i font know what it is :grinning:

or… a two tier stand for a4 and rytm… :slight_smile:
#justsayin

looks like a Vermona Lancet…

2 Likes

Considering how you’ve been building so many evolving sounds, those envelopes on the A + B levels can do so much. Route that through the ST’s drive and filter, and set up some fast and glitchy ratcheted percussion…

6 Likes

I have that stand. works v well , fits the two decksavers also

I had an A4.

I was using fast ramp / saw lfos plocked to volume / filter / anything for that kind of stuff.

1 Like

Nice! I’ve been committed to A4 over the last year almost exclusively and still I have to admit, I really only scratched the surface and did possibly use only half its potential!

2 Likes

what the heck is that

4 Likes

But I read you could get an OT for free.

4 Likes

Yeah Im fairly bad at it after 3 years. I don’t use envelops enough, and transpose function. Perfs and LFOs are tasty and my go to :slight_smile:

ha my attempt to describe the quality of analog synthesis. fuzzier may have been better ha

1 Like

To answer in a different way.

I’ve had Octa, A4, AR, DN, DT and ST, some more than once. But only one at a time really.

Ultimately, I really really like the Rytm pads for banging in notes / samples and using it for mute mode.

Idk it just feels the most like a self contained instrument to me in that I can use samples, synthesis, analog drum sounds, etc.

All that while being, in my opinion, much simpler to use than OT. Or rather, less in my way when I want to create.

I could say a lot of these things about A4 as well (sans sampling) and tbh, it makes some more unique and varied drum tones. The arp / transpose is really great too.

Hard to explain but I’ve just connected with the rytm the most. For a while I fricken hated it. It’s been my most love hate machine. The gain staging and headroom is something you have to wrestle but it feels like a living, breathing beast because of it.

The update smoothed that aspect a ton and it just feels easier to manage whether you want clean, dirty or in between.

The other day I was jamming with some buddies who had some hand drums and shit. Just porch chillin.

I made every pad into sine waves at different pitches with different pan / delay / verb / lfo settings.

I added a bunch of pressure mods to dip the pitch and vary the lfos.

Then I made a quick perf to simultaneously shift all of these notes up a 5th.

The thing played like a real instrument. That’s the side of the Rytm I’m excited to explore more.

6 Likes

“aliased” is a term that applies to low quality digital oscillators or sampling, which would be the maximum opposite of analog oscillators :wink: Wouldn’t even agree on “fuzzy” either, analog oscillators usually sound bright and fat. Of course, using them purposely in a dirty way can lead to purposely fuzzy results :wink:

3 Likes

Enough audio rate mod to anything will get you fuzz. And also aliasing ish sounds because the lfos sound like shit (in a way I appreciate.)

Audio rate lfo on kick panning is a pretty tasty secret. Low amounts, like less than 5 depth.

1 Like

Please… no need to discuss terminology (be it very interesting, educational or not) in here. Everything you might want to add on topic is much appreciated, though!

Thank you! :pray:

2 Likes

… whatever “fuzz” means for you, him or me (presumably three different things) …

… which are digital oscillators, not analog oscillators …

The performance mode with the pads sold me on the Rytm. SY CHIP can do cool stuff that doesn’t sound like chiptune at all [besides chiptune]. Also, that it is a sampler with distortion (contrary to Digitakt). Still I’d never part with the Syntakt, which is much more flexible and I made tons and tons of tracks on it.

5 Likes

Knowing you own(ed?) both, how would you see it in comparison with A4? Like immediacy, flexibility designing sounds, etc…