Hello fellow elektronauts,
I’m new to using a hardware sampler like the Digitakt, I was wondering if I sample a sound and then proceed to resample it, will it degrade the sound in some way or is this strictly a digital operation ?
Thanks,
Tom
1 Like
It’s mostly gonna be lossless – unless you’re doing some processing on it of course.
Apparently there is a veeeery subtle mid/high boost EQ somewhere on the signal chain, but I’m not sure if that renders onto the internal resampling. I suppose you’d need to resample a few dozen times before things notably stack up, I haven’t really noticed anything myself, but haven’t really pushed it very far either.
Have I got a video for you:
He is pitching up and resampling and downtuning to deliberately try to degrade it but yes. I’m not sure what happens when it’s with the base settings. Try it a bunch of times and do an A/B or A/Z test 
7 Likes
Thanks,
Yeah I watched Ricky’s video but he’s purposely destroying the sample.
I’m gonna resample the same sound multiple times without any tweaks inbetween.
Just because I’m an audio nerd and like to understand how stuff ticks.
4 Likes
Nice. Please report back with examples. I’m sure there are plenty of audio nerds (myself included) on here who’d be interested in the results
+1 for posting nerdy Digitakt stuff 
I swear I’ve read someone posting audio examples where they resampled many times and noticed some very minor artefacts, then there was some discussion about that master EQ thing that I mentioned, I think there even was some official Elektron user commenting. It was a few years ago though.
But I can’t find the topic anymore 
Curious to learn the results. Best way is to compare the original with the processed and shifting the phase of one of them to hear the difference only.
OK fellow elektronauts, I’m back from nerding off with samples for a good hour or so while I could/should have been doing something productive 
.
My first experiment was a clean 440Hz sine wave, which I uploaded to the DT and the proceded to resample 10 times by iteratively assigning the new sample to the same track and resampling.
I didn’t find much difference between the 10th sample and the initial source, apart from an amplitude difference due to DT’s normalizing and a slight phase shift/glitch at the start of the sample, which is due to the trigger. This was expected, it’s a simple waveform after all.
So I won’t bother you with audio.
My second experiment was a more complexe waveform with various frequencies and transients, a realistic sample so to speak.
This time I resampled it 20 times.
It is noteworthy that the track had no FX at all, default values across the board.
The difference between sample_0 and sample_20 is already visually apparent (resampled waveform at the top):
Frequency analysis confirms this.
Sample_0
Sample_20
Obviously the proof is in the listening:
Sample_0
Sample_20
22 Likes
Nerd props!
I’m surprised how I instantly find the 2nd sample emotive, whilst the first was just ‘nice’. Probably need a psychologist to explain well why that is
1 Like
Well done !
So the spectral analysis shows there is marked amplification of higher frequencies, like from 5000 Hz on up, relative to frequencies below 5000 Hz.
Could this be a result of compression in this case with lower frequency parts being louder and being more reduced relatively by compression ?
Resampling white noise, and doing a spectral analysis on both might show this to be true or false.
2 Likes
Cheers for taking the time to share your experiment
The spectrum seems to imply a +1.x dB high shelf, I wonder if this is per track or applied on the master 
Were you resampling individual DT track or resampling the master?
1 Like
The track, not the master.
1 Like
That’s pretty interesting, It doesn’t really sound degraded either just EQ’d quite a lot.
I tried that with OT once, it will f*ck up your sample but 20 passes is nowhere near enough. It was very cool
I’ll just leave this here. I did some similar exploring in the past.
4 Likes
thanks for a super interesting experiment!
what in the world is this happening to that audio, and why? 
People complain about OT so they added degradation to make it sound better or something?
Seems to work, people like the tone
1 Like
I wonder if they have a similar thing going on in the Model:Samples or in the Rytm sample engine
Aliasing sounds great here. The pop in high freq content might be a part of internal engine, maybe filter. Would be cool to test it with filter disabled if it werent already.
Rytm sounded darker to my ears, which probably means it has no mid-top end boost like on DT
1 Like