NickD
10
Well, it’s not misleading if you can do it, which you can. It’s just illustrating the limits of the machine, and every machine has its limits. If I was using a 4-track tape recorder and I wanted to record more than four tracks, I’d have to leave at least one spare for bouncing down. It would effectively be a two- or three-track in that instance, but the recorder would still be capable of recording four tracks and it wouldn’t be misleading to say so.
With the OT, if you want to record six straight minutes of internal audio, you can do it but you’ve got to sacrifice a lot of the RAM and make the most of what’s left. If you want to record eight minutes, you’ve got to sacrifice all the RAM and not use flex machines - that’s the limit of the machine. If you want to record nine straight minutes, you’re out of luck - just like I’d be out of luck if I wanted to record five simultaneous tracks on my four track recorder. There are things it can do and things it can’t do, and there’s a point where they meet.
But as a sampler, the OT is capable of sampling eight minutes of audio if you need it to do that. In terms of the original scenario - recording a two-minute sequence - the OT could be a great solution, with plenty of options for tweaking and embellishing the results.
1 Like