the main legal test for trademark infringement is likelihood of confusion. i don’t know if Paramount even sells any goods with the “Tricorder” mark at this point, but if a synth manufacturer were to name their handheld device a “Tricorder” would the average consumer likely think it was confusingly similar to a Star Trek Tricorder toy? would it be worth rolling the dice and potential legal fees to test the theory instead of just calling it something totally original and clearly non-infringing? i know what i would probably do if i were the synth company
1 Like