miketheman wrote…
Yeah, I get you. And you´re right, used properly it is beautiful… an art in itself.
Ugly side is of course (just like in art), when used in a sense as human beings are hostiles. If your ‘neighbour’ isn´t an enemy already, he/she might as well become one for whatever reason. Or treating you as you would be the enemy or the fault of his/hers despair. Disrespectful really.
I´m finding much beautiful “data art” of people doing magic things in/with Processing. Code turning into the most magnificent art seen. Would love to see more of that kind.
On a side note, I´m much into exploring ‘randomness’ within certain limits or structure imposed by myself. Nord Modular G2 lends you much to creations in this concept:
Random generator module => recorded (switchable On/Off at will) into a sequencer module. Its output into an NN# out module. From G2: trigging sounds via MIDI in a Alesis DM Pro drum module. From DM Pro: sounds OneShot sampled in OT, and playback trigs at certain steps, while beat continues alongside.
Funny thing is to set the randomization to go on continously while re-arming the OneShot sampling in the OT. Beat adjusts itself and (sometimes) fits nicely with both the randomization and OneShot sampling. Interesting results.
this all sounds amazing! total inspiration on every line.
as regards the less favourable aspects of humanity that may be reflected in certain journeys undertaken to achieve programming prowess perhaps, yes, it has the potential to have quite a de-humanising effect … perhaps disorienting …
i mean … the lecturers at the Uni where i go to … they are okay, but i feel like they are trying to force me to be depressed by force of boredom. So i don’t go to lectures. Or tutorials. This has worked really well, i found masters-of-the-void.com which helped, and then found an australian lecturer’s videos on algorithms and data structures … named Richard Buckland, he is truly inspirational and fantastic. He has passion, and always insists on teaching the “why” of algorithm design.
but yeah, the Uni’s standard learning material is so … mundane. They talk about a Linked List and relate it to some boring business database idea… “get the worker’s number and name” … oh, yeah … let’s run around in a mouse cage for some big business. Not to put commercial enterprise programming down in any way, as well done it is an artform, but … no. The learning material is so standard run of the mill, not encouraging of any fanciful thinking. That is understandable as the material to learn is so mind-blowing, maybe they think that keeping it simple is the best approach.
if only they would describe how a doubly inked list could be used to hold an audio snippet in random access memory, and then connect an iPad’s touchscreen controls to that.
Or help students to create functions that enable user-definable chorus effects, perhaps employing a Sorted Binary Heap Tree to innovate glittery rain-style effects through spritzing the audio clip’s data into a cloud of algorithmically connected particles of coolness.