Note that most newer interfaces will function standalone without a computer as well (including the M2). Just USB-C power and off you go.
But the Analog Heat MK2 has very nice analog circuitry to make your OT sound even better
Note that most newer interfaces will function standalone without a computer as well (including the M2). Just USB-C power and off you go.
But the Analog Heat MK2 has very nice analog circuitry to make your OT sound even better
I like recording the OT with the Heat, but thatâs when I want to saturate my signal. I wouldnât think of it as the best interface for the OT though. I also wouldnât choose it as my go-to recording interface, especially for clean signals. Doesnât it have a higher noise floor than most interfaces? Iâm not sure, Iâve never measured.
I think a good interface for recording the Octatrack is a good interface for recording anything. I donât think thereâs anything special about the way the OT outputs a signal that requires any specific interface. Most of the bad OT recordings Iâve heard (or made) seem to be due to problematic mixes inside the OT.
yes agreed, well aware itâs a case of simply a good recording. my question was should I be thinking of upgrading the tascam us 2x2, not is there a specific way to record the octatrack.
yes aware most will do this as well - yes indeed, Iâm keen to hear the octatrack thru one
I would make sure to get something with MIDI and enough audio I/O for your needs.
When I record the OT, I usually just record the main outputs, but you could get an interface with many ins and outs, to bring signals out of the computer and back into the OT. In addition to the mains, you could also go out the OT Cue into the computer and back into the OT, if thatâs useful to you. I donât really do all of that, but itâs definitely possible.
I realize Iâm talking about I/O and not âsound qualityâ, but Iâm trying to think of OT-specific needs for an interface
I would suggest this in itself is probably not an issue. Of course a higher input level would give you a lower noise floor but any gain in the analog domain to bring it up would also bring up the noise and add more. In terms of dynamic range, at 24bits you can get away with pretty low levels without losing anything significant, thatâs probably why it has all that headroom youâre seeing. Basically just normalise and/or whack up the gain in Live.
Edit: you also probably want to be using balanced (TRS) cables and have the interface inputs in balanced mode. For best results, not necessarily loudest. But a mismatch or the wrong cable could cause issues.
thank you for these considerations, itâs good food for thought.
thanks, Iâve just ordered balanced udg trs cables for recording the octatrack yesterday.
I donât actually know if the current ones Iâm using are balanced as they are old so itâll be cool to hear if that improves the chain, it could well do. I need to do some testing actually.
I know my trs -> xlr are balanced as I got them when I got my genelecs in more recent years.
thanks everyone by the way - youâve all given me some really useful and varied points to consider - nice first thread experience on the forum.
this is such a low hanging fruit - theyâre unbalanced
i canât believe iâve been making music this long and not known this - i knew i wanted balanced, i just never realised those cables werenât.
to be fair, iâve been mostly software the entire time. thanks for pointing this out, thatâs an easy improvement!
good resource regarding connectors / elektron devices if anyone finds themselves here in the future.
Disclaimer: pedantry.
Cables (and their connectors) are not balanced or unbalanced. Cables are just cables. TRS and XLR are âup to two channelâ connectors.
Itâs the circuits sending and receiving the signals which are balanced/unbalanced. Balanced signals need two channels, so your TRS->XLR will work fine for that job. The Octatrack has balanced outputs (actually, I think theyâre âimpedance-balancedâ). Your recorder/interface will need balanced inputs to make use of that balanced signal.
Balanced signals shouldnât make much difference if youâre just running the signal across a desk. But it might
Sorry⌠I went for the nerdsplaining before reading the rest of the thread with the helpful diagrams and links.
all good
yeah on reading i realise it might not make much of a diff for a short cable, canât hurt to try though.
I have been an RME fan since 2004. Right now I am using the RME Digiface USB + one Audient Evo SP8. 24/48 is more than perfect for me, especially running at 32 samples 24/7. For midi I use my faithful Korg Padkontrol to track all my midi DIN gear since 2010. Perfect timing alignment.
just thought Iâd post back here with an update that I won an analogue heat MKII on eBay so will be trialling it out to see if itâs for me.
i actually think for now my little tascam is fine for what I need. Iâve been running audio out from the laptop and using it as a sample source for the octatrack, until I need more I/O this is fine.
thanks for all the input.
Donât worry too much about audio quality⌠Nobody is able to spot a difference between a cheap Tascam and some high end stuff - in a double-blind listening test with matching audio levels. Your ears are very sensitive to audio levels and if one device is just 1dB louder, you will perceive it as âbetterâ. And thatâs because of the hearing curve of our ears, they are very good in the midrange but highs and lows are attenuated, so hearing a louder signal will make the highs and lows more apparent.
Anyway, proper gain staging and a really good mix will always be much, much more valuable than a change in hardware. The stuff built into cheap audio interfaces these days is miles ahead of studio gear in the 90s.
yeah to be honest since I posted this and taking on board some of these posts I feel this way.
I will get a balanced cable but other than that my tascam inputs are plenty good enough.
and as always, things like volume and sound selection make way more difference than any of this.
I can use the analog heat mkii as my soundcard now tho so if itâs for me and itâs staying I can sell the tascam on or give it to a friend.
Balanced cables wonât make an audible difference. The signal can be louder though which, again, you might interpret as better.
The main advantage of balanced cables is better shielding which makes them less prone to noise or other interferences. And thatâs usually only a problem with long cables and weâre not talking about five meters (more like 20 and more), thatâs totally fine for unbalanced cables. If you donât get any strange noises (apart from the usual noise floor of your preamp), they wonât make anything better. Then again, they arenât expensive and it wonât hurt to use themâŚ