Lets all take a step back and chill guys.
Force. (Latest firmware v3.7.1 is available in InMusic Software Center on Mac & Win).
btw, never liked MPCs. 4x4 wasnāt enough, Seq>Trk>Prog was illogical, Akaiās samplerās S&S was weak compared to Kurzweil, Emu, Ensoniq, Yamaha, Casioā¦(itās much more powerful now but OS needs serious optimization, bug fixes, etc.). Much preferred the MV8000, RS7000, heck even the buggy ASR-X Pro. Just my opinions.
I checked there & canāt find it there. Where exactly would it be located in the app?
I didnāt like the 4x4 layout for playing keys/synths.
I didnāt use all those other samplers so I speak on that but Iāve heard many say the same about some them, especially the some of the EMU samplers. I think the MPC had a better sampler & sample management than the RS7000 with its SmartMedia cards that still think were the best looking memory cards ever!
Nope. Both things can be true. The name wasnāt a mistake & yes it couldāve sold better with MPC in the title. Thatās name went it for a reason. My opinion about doesnāt make it a mistake. I also put a reason why they may purposely went with that name. Why didnāt you take that in consideration?
You mentioned the traditional MPC that Linn was a part of which goes back to the 3k in on 93/94 as if it anything outside of the form isnāt a MPC. I was pointing out all the MPCs that changed that form. Now you moved the goal post by saying in the last 10 years what MPC had 10 pads which still doesnāt explain that there MPCs keyboards, synths, FXs & clip-matrix⦠If I canāt mention the 500 than you mention Linn. Also, there nothing stopping Akai currently own by inMusic which had nothing to do with Linn from making a MPC 64/32 or whatever. Linn MPCs didnāt have step-seq buttons & 16 Qlinks.
Yes I did.
This is something that weāre going to have to agree to disagree on. But you havenāt giving me anything to make me think others wise. How would naming it the MPC-Force or even the MPC-64 hurt sales or made it less popular? You mentioned that MPC heads only like 16 pads & thatās a weak point. Since you canāt speak for all & they never option an MPC with more pads only less.
Thatās your opinion thanks sharing. The lack MPC in the title, the bad release & poor marketing over years is part of also. I mentioned many MPC users donāt know shit about the Force & how its OS are very similar & that most of the MPC3.0 features they were happy to get was from the Force. Thatās bad marketing on Akai. Just calling it the Force isolated it from the MPC to point of making potential customers not even consider it because all they know is MPC. Itās not that difficult to understand.
Naming it MPC-Whatever wouldnāt meant that everyone wouldāve got it either but more people looking for the MPC experience wouldāve had at considered it & it wouldāve been part of the main MPC threads across the web & even this very site.
No, but I read many comments from them on different sites & is something me & Force have joked about. Iām on MPC site/forums/YT channels more the Force sites. Itās not pretty obvious mosy only know about is the MPC.
So you admit the weāre going in circles? Cool.
Force 2/ MPC-64/ MPC-Force I donāt care what they call it, just make it!
Peace!
Weāre the only ones keeping this thread active ![]()
We canāt have a friendly disagreement?
If youāve registered it with InMusic (must use same email), then in the app, under Hardware your Force should be listed. Click on it and you should see the latest firmware (click to download). If you need help, just ask or DM.
Re: Old Samplers:
Emu: Much deeper synthesis options than Akai.
Kurzweil: Ridiculously deep synthesis (VAST, FUNS, KDFX, etc).
Ensoniq: Transwave (loop window modulation).
Yamaha A-series: Decent synthesis (deeper than Akai, interesting sample remixing (Emu later implemented something similar), cutting-edge tempo-synced FX, excellent digital filters).
Casio FZ-10m: Late 1980s sampler (1st one with a graphical display, additive synthesis, draw your own waveforms, excellent digital filters, extended envelopes, thick sound, etc).
All this activity on the thread I thought there was a leak or something! One can dream!
Thanks looked & saw the updater but I thought that just the general app we needed to update via PC mode. When I clicked the i symbol I saw 3.7.1. I test it out later after work. Has it running OK? Many on the MPC have been saying itās buggy & went back to 3.7.0.
Re: Old Samplers
You seem to know a lot about all this. Most of these devices came out when I watching Muppet Babies! But I love learning about this stuff. YT is great learning about all kinds of vintage gear. I wish Akai had EMUās G-chip for its samples.
My bad, but this started off with a āmaybe leakā:
Hopefully, his feeling is true. Until then, like you, Iāll be dreaminā like Vanessa Williams.
I donāt care what they call it - if it has the CPU, RAM, and Audio Track increases Iāve been wanting for the last 3 years Iāll probably buy it, just make the thing already. Theyāre probably figuring out how to make the MPC-E (or whatever itās called) truly badass so Force2 is the MPC choice for the instrumentalist who also happens to be a beatmaker.
Since Iām divining the future here, Iāll add:
Now if theyāll just sort it and port all of the Air Software to the MPC / Force OS, and buy Native Instruments and make that library of sounds and software availableā¦
Imagine, the best of Maschine+ & Kontakt library absorbed into Force / MPC ecosystem like an in-utero vestigial twin, tweaked for optimal usage stand-alone or with the newly-titled
Force Majeur software.
Cāest lĆ” vie
I feel you on all that!
I think all they would have to do is take away some of the plastic that divides the pads, so that 4 pads like pad 1, 2, 5 & 6 would be connected but still independent or connect all the pads but add that a smaller version of bank divider pad cut design thatās in the middle of the 64 pads to middle of each of 4 sections of pads.
In other words the Force already has 64 sections & Akai would just have to connect them so they are 4x4, but still 64 independent pads. I hope that make sense.
Force? Correct - which is why it was chosen.
& yes it couldāve sold better with MPC in the title.
Thatās your opinion; thanks for sharing. This is something that weāre going to have to agree to disagree on. But you havenāt giving me anything to make me think otherwise.
You mentioned that MPC heads only like 16 pads & thatās a weak point.
How is that weak when itās literally the reality? 16 pads is literally - and philosophically - the āMPCā. But donāt take my word for it - look at the last ~10 years of the modern MPC.
No, but I read many comments from them
Me too, and I donāt read much about āmostā MPC heads thinking that Force features were never on the Force. Funny how that works!
So you admit the weāre going in circles? Cool.
Weāve had this tango before - I doubt it will be the last.
Force 2/ MPC-64/ MPC-Force I donāt care what they call it, just make it! Peace!
Oh itāll come, and it will be majestic. And not called MPC-anything. LOL!
Weāre the only ones keeping this thread active
We canāt have a friendly disagreement?
Yeah Iām not sure what monsterism is talking about - no one is being disrespectful or hostile.
Your wish is their command. And it will still be called Force.
![]()
Yup!
Thatās one more thing we can agree on. ![]()
If thatās what they wanna call it, make it happen. This time around the name wonāt matter as much as MPC3.0 would have done most of leg work preparing MPC heads to the Force features - the main thing being the Clip-matrix, so now the new model comes out more of them will be more open & interested based on it having an OS thatās familiar but better designed to work with the matrix as the pads match the screen unlike the clunky-ass L3 & XL.
Also by then they should have the desktop software out of beta & Force being able to be used in controller mode (if they make it compatible) would be even more appealing.
Have you downloaded 3.7.1 & if so, has been running smoothly?
Iām about to download (now that I know where to find it. Akai website still says 3.7.0) but you seem to more of power users so if anybody would know it would be you. Thanks!
Buggy, as expected.
Some of the features added in 3.5+ are powerful, but are CPU hogs. Spikes >80% in a project with only 3 tracks with Keygroups using sliced samplechains, each slice looping, Slice Motion on, Mod Matrix slots, quite a bit of random, yeah it should use more CPU, but not that much.
Gen2 is 4x more powerful? I fear itāll be like the iPad 2, where Apple forced an OS update that was too much for it, turning it into a paperweight. āSo what? Buy an iPad 3!ā
My Live 3 seems to be doing just fine. As a new Force will use the exact same CPU/RAM, any weirdness will propagate over to both - and hopefully be addressed. Not worried about it.
The mod on MPC-Forums pointed out the new OS can be found on the Akai site in the āLooking for older versionsā section:
Sloppy.
btw, that project I was talking about earlier with >80% CPU spikes using only 3 tracks w/ advanced Keygroupsā¦that project has a grand total of 3 samples.
I know a meme isnāt the best you got. Make your case.
Also, I asked you a question about how is 3.7.1 is running for you?
I donāt mind having our friendly disagreements but we should also help each out as well or do you disagree with that too?
If so, I donāt mind that, but Iāll like to know for the future.
Had to edit this because it got flagged. LOLā¦
I was jokingly giving you props about your response to him, because I know you can do better than that, but if you felt he flagged your post I can see why you responded like that.
I didnāt know you didnāt install it & just thought you were ignoring my question. Nothing sensitive on my side just a misunderstanding. I just started selling new products for my company & havenāt had the time to deal with the Force lately, but now that I updated it, Iāll do my own test when I can. I just wanted to know others experiences as many have said itās kinda buggy.