^
fair point. :wink:

Well in that case - the A4’s perf mode is great for tweaking ( as discussed in another thread I think ) & in that regard for ‘performance’ it probably wins out vs the MnM. The sequencer of the A4 is better - micro-timing, individual track lengths…& the note slide is nice.

But, sonically I much prefer the MnM … it’ sound design potential seems much deeper to me…the ability to use tracks in FX chains … the fact that every track has it’s own delay…the ARP works better… & if we’re talking purely subjectively, then I just ultimately didn’t like the sound of the A4 that much.
The filter is to my mind a bit …well .meh…& overall the whole sound is a bit woolly & ill-defined. And there was something about the control via that interface : the MnM, as a digital synth, responds to the encoders just how you’d expect …now maybe I’ve spent too many years using analogues with, well, analogue controls. but I just found it hard to ‘communicate’ with the A4 via it’s interface.
Now this could be me : I had the same problem with my DSI mono evolver keyboard - hated the endless encoders : I just coudn’t get the accuracy & precision or that fast response that I expected from a pot.
Don’t get me wrong - the A4 is a great instrument…& when you see what you’re getting for the money it’s incredible : hell, in an ideal world I would’ve kept it for the CV sequencing alone, but I just couldn’t justify it.
But the MnM is still my ultimate ‘desert island’ synth -I can just get lost in that sucker for days with just a pair of headphones. I’ve often contemplated getting another… I just love the sound & the interface.