I tried and tried with A4. Never gelled with it. But I sure wouldn’t characterize it as a dull sounding synth. Perhaps a little too wild in fact, for me. I’d say it’s strength is hyper-modulated mid-range sounds, not something I want or need in my style of music.
I guess I was hoping for a compact little “do it all” workhorse, which it is, but turns out I prefer specialization, immediacy, hands-on, wider sweet-spots, etc. I’m more of a Juno 106 type of guy. Just don’t have a lot of time to sit down with a cup of coffee, instruction manual, and go into that introverted synth-nerd zone that the A4 seems to call for. I found myself always trying to replicate a simple Juno stab, Moog bass, or MS20 triangle lead. I got very close, but I’d rather just get those synths I think. I’m more about songwriting than deep sound design and I need more simple synths to support that. Hell, sometimes these days I wonder if I need a powerful hardware synth at all. I get plenty of mileage from putting software-synth samples into the Rytm!
I think it’s all about buying and trying, working through it, and zeroing in on your ideal setup. If the A4 isn’t working out, keep looking. No harm in that. People can argue until the cows come home about sound quality (I think it’s great!), but I think people will ultimately keep or sell based on workflow, UI, genre, time and energy for music-making, etc.
Also… damn, Robert T! Nice stuff!